Yadav said the ASI was not in a position to furnish a correct report without excavation and therefore it should be ordered to conduct the excavation and survey the entire Gyanvapi complex.

On October 8, the Muslim side — Anjuman Intezamia Committee — had presented its views on the petition.

The lawyers then reportedly submitted before the court that when the Hindu side has appealed to agitate the case in the high court and Supreme Court, there was no point arguing the matter in the trial court.

They also submitted that when the ASI survey of the Gyanvapi complex had been done once already, there was no justification for conducting another survey.

The lawyers of the committee had also stated that digging a pit in the mosque premises for the survey was not practical in any way, and could damage the mosque.

Previously, the Hindu side had argued that the original place of ‘Jyotirlinga’ was in the centre, under the dome of the purported mosque located in the Gyanvapi complex.

“Geographical water used to flow continuously from the ‘Argha’ which used to collect in the Gyanvapi Kund. It was believed that drinking this water gives knowledge. Therefore, this pilgrimage is also considered as ‘Gyanoday Tirth’,” it was argued earlier during hearings.

The Hindu party has demanded the examination of the water through water engineering, geologists and archeologists.

Further, the ‘Shivling’ found from the Gyanoday Tirth, which the Muslim side termed as the “wazukhana”, should also be examined to ascertain whether it is a ‘Shivling’ or a fountain, they had said.

First Published: Oct 10 2024 | 6:22 PM IST